Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Election '08: Thoughts on Three Republicans in Crisis Mode

John McCain: Seeing his momentum starting to slip away as the economy takes hold of the national discussion, the wiley senator from Arizona executes another brilliant move. This afternoon, he announces a suspension in his campaign and says he will delay Friday's scheduled debate with Barack Obama so he can return to Washington and help solve the economic crisis. This is another master stroke, making himself look like a bold, statesmanlike, and nonpartisan leader. He has changed the national discussion once again.

Obama, initially muttering something about a president being able to "multitask," is clearly caught off guard. Chalk one up for the old guy who supposedly doesn't know how to use a computer.

George W. Bush: The president, his public approval ratings still in the toilet, could have sounded defensive and accusatory in his brief address to the nation tonight about the proposed bailout. After all, many Democrats-including Barney Frank and Barack Obama-bear a large part of the responsibility for the mess we are in. But Bush's priority is not to defend his "legacy" but to bring all sides together to solve the problem. He blames no one and admits his plan is a work in process. This evening reminds me of the man's basic decency and good will. Good job, Mr. President.

Sarah Palin: Amid the hounding of an angry media elite that she is not giving enough interviews, Palin today has a sit-down with Katie Couric. Again, she seems too deferential to a news person seeking mainly to embarrass her. When Couric asks her what measures McCain has taken to address national financial problems, Palin gives her a perfectly good answer. But Couric, sensing weakness, presses the Alaska governor for more examples. After some verbal stalling, Palin eventually admits she can't cite any more and will get back to her. You can almost hear Couric's triumphant "Gotcha!"

I wish Palin had instead said this, with a smile: "Katie, I've already answered this question. I think you might be trying to score political points here, and that's inappropriate, given the crisis facing our nation this week. Let's either move on to another subject, or this interview is over. Please don't waste my time, or the American's people's time." Palin, who is pretty new to the national spotlight, may not have all the answers on the tip of her tongue, but she should demonstrate to her adversaries in the press that she is not to be messed with.

Kind of like John McCain.

4 Comments:

Blogger Steve K. said...

Stan,

You're just repeating the McCain campaign talking points. Where's the objective analysis?

McCain used the opportunity of this economic crisis to score political points. If he intended to go on TV at 3 p.m. to make this announcement, he should have done the honorable thing and told Obama during their 2:30 p.m. phone call that this was his plan. McCain didn't (according to Obama), and that's dishonest and dishonorable. Another example of McCain making rash judgments and less-than-truthful statements.

In contrast, Obama's 4:30 p.m. press conference (where he actually took questions from reporters!? when was the last time McCain or Palin did that??? oh yeah, over a month ago!) -- yeah, Obama looked much more cool-headed and presidential. "Muttering" my butt, Stan.

I won't comment on President Bush trying to sell us his $700 billion socialization of Wall Street, although I wouldn't use "decency and good will" if I did.

Finally, "her adversaries in the press," Stan? You're repeating the RNC culture war rallying cry here. It's bullocks. Palin is not prepared to be VP. She's certainly not prepared to be President if McCain (whose health we really have no clue about because he hasn't released his medical records to the public) were to fall ill. She's not even prepared to answer simple questions in a sit-down interview with Katie "Softball" Couric. I didn't see the whole interview, but I certainly saw her answer to that question and I certainly hope the "awww shucks"-iness of her response doesn't fool anyone into thinking she's "prepared." (sigh)

Anyway, there's always two sides to each of these stories.

10:54 PM  
Blogger Steve K. said...

Stan,

I've been mulling this over for two days, and I just want to apologize to you for the tone of my previous comment. Obviously I feel strongly about what's at stake in this election, and I engage in political discussions/debate with friends and family regularly. But in this online space, you and I don't know each other in real life, so it was inappropriate for me to take the tack with you that I did in my comment (and also previous comments here).

I have great respect for you and all that you are doing for the cause of God's global mission. That's why I began following your blog in the first place. I certainly don't intend to stop reading your blog because you occasionally post political things that I disagree with, and I really don't want to put a sour taste in your mouth for me, the organizations that I am affiliated with, or the work I have been called to do in communication and mission. I've probably already soured this "relationship" with my political comments, and that's why I just wanted to apologize to you for that.

Shalom,
Steve K.

12:11 PM  
Blogger Stan Guthrie said...

Steve,

I'm greatly encouraged by your apology and accept it humbly. I know I have sometimes gotten into embarrassing arguments over politics. (My wife still kids me over a shouting match I got into with a Clinton supporter during a July 4th parade in 1996!) I believe politics is an important subject, but friendships are even more important, and I'm pleased to call you a friend.

Here's what I said to someone else last week who disagrees with me about this election; I think it applies to us as well:

"I trust we'll all do our best after the election to support the winners. I know you'll agree that the country is facing enormous
challenges."

Best,

Stan

12:40 PM  
Blogger Steve K. said...

Amen to that, Stan!

Thanks for your gracious hospitality and friendship here in the blogosphere.

12:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home